Research use only — not for human or animal use, and not FDA-reviewed. Full disclaimers

Reading a certificate of analysis

What a lot number has to line up with, what each line on a certificate is actually measuring, and which labs turn up in the data we collect.

The eight lines we score

What is in the vial

We expect all three of these before we take a listing seriously.

  • Identification
  • Net content
  • Net purity

What should not be

We score each one the vendor chooses to publish, and Conformity covers the batch rather than the vial.

  • Endotoxins
  • Sterility
  • Heavy metals
  • Fentanyl
  • Conformity

The number that ties it all together

A listing only means something here if the vendor puts a lot or batch number on the product and that same number appears on a certificate for the same material. Where the two do not match, the certificate is about somebody else's vial.

Certificate of analysis
A lab's report on one sampled batch: what was tested, by what method, what came back, and what would have counted as a pass.
Lot number
The code tying a specific production run to that report. The vial, the box, and the certificate should all carry the same one.

Line by line

Identification

We expect this on every listing
What it proves
The vial holds the compound named on the label.
What it does not
Says nothing about how much is in there, or how clean it is.
How it is read
Mass spectrometry, usually after a chromatographic separation. The instrument weighs the fragments, and the pattern either matches the labelled sequence or it does not. On a certificate this shows up as a pass beside a method name. Everything else on the sheet is moot if this line fails.

Net Content

We expect this on every listing
What it proves
How much peptide the vial actually holds, against what the label claims.
What it does not
A vial can hit its stated mass and still be full of the wrong material — that is what identification is for.
How it is read
Peptides usually ship as a salt, and the counterion weighs something. A gross figure counts that salt; a net figure does not, so read which one you are being shown before comparing two vendors. Measured by HPLC against a certified reference standard and reported as a percentage of the label claim.

Net Purity

We expect this on every listing
What it proves
How much of what is in the vial is the compound you wanted, rather than truncated chains, oxidised residues, or leftover reagent.
What it does not
A high figure is about chemistry, not safety — it does not rule out bacteria, endotoxin, or metals.
How it is read
HPLC. The chromatogram is integrated and the target's peak is expressed against the total peak area, so the number is a share of what the detector saw and not of the whole vial.

Endotoxins

Scored when a vendor publishes it
What it proves
Whether the batch carries the cell-wall fragments left behind by Gram-negative bacteria.
What it does not
Does not tell you anything is alive in there, and does not cover other contaminants.
How it is read
The LAL assay, reported in EU per mg or per mL. Worth knowing that a batch can be perfectly sterile and still fail this, because the bacteria that shed the fragments do not have to survive.

Sterility

Scored when a vendor publishes it
What it proves
That nothing viable was growing in the sample — no bacteria, yeast, or mould.
What it does not
A clean result here says nothing about endotoxin, which is a separate line on the sheet.
How it is read
The sample is either inoculated into growth media directly or filtered onto a membrane, then incubated and watched. A pass means nothing grew under those conditions.

Heavy Metals

Scored when a vendor publishes it
What it proves
Whether elemental contaminants — lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury and their neighbours — came along from the reagents, raw materials, or the equipment.
What it does not
Screens for elements, so it will not surface an organic impurity of any kind.
How it is read
ICP-MS, which reaches parts-per-billion. Certificates normally print a limit beside each element rather than a single overall verdict.

Fentanyl

Scored when a vendor publishes it
What it proves
That the batch was checked for fentanyl and its close structural relatives.
What it does not
It is a targeted screen, so it only finds what it was told to look for.
How it is read
LC-MS/MS at trace detection limits. This sits outside the usual identity and purity panel, so a vendor has to commission and publish it deliberately for it to appear at all.

Conformity

Scored when a vendor publishes it
What it proves
That several vials pulled from one lot agree with each other.
What it does not
It is a batch-level check, so it can never speak for the specific vial you were sent.
How it is read
Identity, content, and purity re-run across multiple pulls from the same run. This is the only line that can surface uneven filling or contamination confined to part of a batch — a single-vial certificate cannot.

How old is too old

A certificate describes one batch on one day, so age matters. Where we know the date, we show it and let you weigh it — we do not drop a listing for having an older certificate, and we would rather show you the date than quietly decide for you. A vendor who republishes results as batches turn over is telling you something a vendor sitting on a two-year-old sheet is not.

Educational only, and not medical advice. Where our summary and the lab's report disagree, the report wins. We aggregate what retailers choose to publish; we do not audit certificates.